Fix mutex passed by value warning #57
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jeffreylovitz
force-pushed
the
mutex-passed-by-value
branch
from
a3c7d8e to
62406fe
Compare
swilly22
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since the
Graphstruct contains a mutex, misbehaviors can occur if this struct is copied by pass-by-value returns.GraphNewinstantiates and returns aGraphvalue, but this is safe because no other copies of the object exist.The
DeepSourcecomplaint can be simply avoided by returning the newGraphstruct directly rather than assigning it to a local variable first.